Only three sleeps to Xmas!
I'm just so over the whole thing already. It's going to rain solidly until the 9th January, when it will become scorchio for the rest of the month.
In fact, I question whether we need public holidays at all. New Zealanders get 15 days mandatory holiday a year (rising to 20 at some vanishingly distant point in the future) and unlike other countries, that's all most people get. In addition, we get ten days of public holidays - so we get 15 days of our own choice and 10 at the same time as everyone else.
Also, most employers *make* their employees take 3-6 days over Christmas and New Years - reducing freely chosen holidays to 9 days - not long enough for a fortnight's break.
Why not just make it 25 (rising to 30) days of the employee's choice with compulsory leave banned? Then I could choose to work through till January, then take some holiday when it's all quietened down - or just take a 3 day weekend overy other week.
Thursday, December 22, 2005
Friday, December 02, 2005
C.P.F.Z.
I've decided to declare this site a Canadian Politics Free Zone (CPFZ) for the duration of our great neighbour to the Northeast's election, maybe longer.
Canadians are cool people, but there's something about their politics that brings on the snore factor. If the Quebecois were to engage in violent succession and threaten the US with nuclear attack, then things might get more exciting - I find this unlikely though..
Would anyone like to join me in ths effort - I could design a logo.
For those who are interested, here is a link to an explanation of Canadian electoral law, translated into French by Google.
Canadians are cool people, but there's something about their politics that brings on the snore factor. If the Quebecois were to engage in violent succession and threaten the US with nuclear attack, then things might get more exciting - I find this unlikely though..
Would anyone like to join me in ths effort - I could design a logo.
For those who are interested, here is a link to an explanation of Canadian electoral law, translated into French by Google.
Up the
I drive past this apartment block in Auckland on my way to work.
It's called Cittá - this is the Italian word for city, only with the accent the wrong way round, it should be Città.
While they were changing the accents to help the graphic design, I wonder if they considered using a French-style cedilla accent, as in: Çitta. That would be pronounced - Shitter.
It's called Cittá - this is the Italian word for city, only with the accent the wrong way round, it should be Città.
While they were changing the accents to help the graphic design, I wonder if they considered using a French-style cedilla accent, as in: Çitta. That would be pronounced - Shitter.
Friday, November 18, 2005
Theoretically cheap
The Herald reports today on the MIT Media Lab's OLPC scheme to produce an USD100 (NZD150) laptop for schoolchildren in developing countries.
Reading the website in more detail, one thing I notice is that the $100 is a manufacturing cost (and they are actually finding quotes closer to $110). I worked on a consumer device project a while ago, and we reckoned on a sale price of four times the factory cost. You might think that excessive, but there are a lot of costs in getting a design into a factory and getting units to end users (R&D, purchasing, distribution, cost of capital, retailers margin, advertising, support, etc...)
Now the first thing you'd say is that OLPC aren't evil capitalists out to make a profit, so that will reduce the price substantially? Won't it? Well the largest maker of "cheap for a reason" PCs, Dell, made a 6% profit last year. Most mutuals (like Southern Cross or the Uk's Nationwide Building Society) don't sell their products much cheaper than profit making competitors - they usually reckon to aim to make a surplus and pass it back to customers in later years - aiming at break-even is just too risky. You'd probably expect OLPC to target a 10% surplus in the early stages just to cover contingencies - so their margins will need to be *more* than the commercial competition.
They also plan a rather different supply chain to the rest of the industry. They intend to sell in minimum quantities of a million units directly to developing country governments. For cash. Won't that cut out all the distribution costs? Well... The devices will still need to be boxed, shipped, distributed to the schools or whatever. The teachers (at least) will need to be trained. They will need a helpdesk, as well as some means of getting faulty units fixed. They'll need upgrades. The machines will need to be localised (unless part of the plan is to impose the English language on everyone). The governments themselves will need to fund the purchase of the machines - probably a good year ahead of any actual deliveries.
If the assumption is that the governments are going to receive bulk shipments of hardware and find everything else themselves, then the $100 price isn't real - they'd need to buy the laptops *and* set up a whole infrastructure to support them.
It's also not reasonable to assume that just because the sales are negotiated with governments, there won't be any sales costs. Even honest governments will take quite a lot of negotiating before they will fork out $100 million (plus possibly the same again in support costs, as we saw above). They might reasonably want OLPC to set up a back-to-back aid deal to finance the purchase. Also, many developing countries have rather corrupt governments and will probably want substantial bribes - all of which is going to send OLPC's overheads up.
So this $100 laptop is starting to look at having an effective retail price not far short of $400.
How does that compare with Evil Capitalism? Dell are offering a laptop for $499 with the usual 30G hard disk, 256 measly megabytes of RAM, Celeron, Windows XP, etc.
It does strike me that the OLPC could just go to tender for five million bog standard laptops loaded with Linux (or persuade MSFT to donate Windows licenses), drop-shipped to various third world airports. Add in a bit of subsidy from their public spirited backers (Google etc) and the total cost once the boxes reach the schoolroom will probably be a whole lot less than Negroponte's neat green and yellow boxes.
Final cynical point - this is a pretty major product development project - how many of the people on the OLPC board have experience in mass market product design and production. Answer: none of them!
The picture looks cool though!
Reading the website in more detail, one thing I notice is that the $100 is a manufacturing cost (and they are actually finding quotes closer to $110). I worked on a consumer device project a while ago, and we reckoned on a sale price of four times the factory cost. You might think that excessive, but there are a lot of costs in getting a design into a factory and getting units to end users (R&D, purchasing, distribution, cost of capital, retailers margin, advertising, support, etc...)
Now the first thing you'd say is that OLPC aren't evil capitalists out to make a profit, so that will reduce the price substantially? Won't it? Well the largest maker of "cheap for a reason" PCs, Dell, made a 6% profit last year. Most mutuals (like Southern Cross or the Uk's Nationwide Building Society) don't sell their products much cheaper than profit making competitors - they usually reckon to aim to make a surplus and pass it back to customers in later years - aiming at break-even is just too risky. You'd probably expect OLPC to target a 10% surplus in the early stages just to cover contingencies - so their margins will need to be *more* than the commercial competition.
They also plan a rather different supply chain to the rest of the industry. They intend to sell in minimum quantities of a million units directly to developing country governments. For cash. Won't that cut out all the distribution costs? Well... The devices will still need to be boxed, shipped, distributed to the schools or whatever. The teachers (at least) will need to be trained. They will need a helpdesk, as well as some means of getting faulty units fixed. They'll need upgrades. The machines will need to be localised (unless part of the plan is to impose the English language on everyone). The governments themselves will need to fund the purchase of the machines - probably a good year ahead of any actual deliveries.
If the assumption is that the governments are going to receive bulk shipments of hardware and find everything else themselves, then the $100 price isn't real - they'd need to buy the laptops *and* set up a whole infrastructure to support them.
It's also not reasonable to assume that just because the sales are negotiated with governments, there won't be any sales costs. Even honest governments will take quite a lot of negotiating before they will fork out $100 million (plus possibly the same again in support costs, as we saw above). They might reasonably want OLPC to set up a back-to-back aid deal to finance the purchase. Also, many developing countries have rather corrupt governments and will probably want substantial bribes - all of which is going to send OLPC's overheads up.
So this $100 laptop is starting to look at having an effective retail price not far short of $400.
How does that compare with Evil Capitalism? Dell are offering a laptop for $499 with the usual 30G hard disk, 256 measly megabytes of RAM, Celeron, Windows XP, etc.
It does strike me that the OLPC could just go to tender for five million bog standard laptops loaded with Linux (or persuade MSFT to donate Windows licenses), drop-shipped to various third world airports. Add in a bit of subsidy from their public spirited backers (Google etc) and the total cost once the boxes reach the schoolroom will probably be a whole lot less than Negroponte's neat green and yellow boxes.
Final cynical point - this is a pretty major product development project - how many of the people on the OLPC board have experience in mass market product design and production. Answer: none of them!
The picture looks cool though!
Thursday, November 17, 2005
Imaginary?
Five internet entities that are less real than A J Chesswas:
1. Craig Ranapia
Maori National supporter I can believe, gay National supporter I can just about believe, but gay Maori National supporter?
2. The women variously featured on David Farrar's blog.
3. Ms Vilefile
Has to be a bloke.. All apparently desirable chicks on the Net are.
4. The about-towners.
They sound like socialists but they hold office in the Labour party?
5. Rich
The product of a buggy experimental auto-comment generator seeded with a database of new Zealand media.
1. Craig Ranapia
Maori National supporter I can believe, gay National supporter I can just about believe, but gay Maori National supporter?
2. The women variously featured on David Farrar's blog.
3. Ms Vilefile
Has to be a bloke.. All apparently desirable chicks on the Net are.
4. The about-towners.
They sound like socialists but they hold office in the Labour party?
5. Rich
The product of a buggy experimental auto-comment generator seeded with a database of new Zealand media.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
